What do you think of trump’s AG Todd Blanche admitting on video he is absolutely not going forward with prosecuting any of the Epstein clients, even when confronted about the fact that other countries are prosecuting some of them?
Doesn’t it remind you a bit of the pedo-protecting DAs and police departments who say “we will not accept ‘vigilante’ evidence”? That’s what it reminds me of.. and here’s another question; who’s the guy who hired Todd Blanche, and who has the power to fire him? The DOJ is actively stopping any kid fuckers from being prosecuted and they’re basically telling all the victims to go fuck themselves.
Catch 4/14 on FB
https://fb.watch/GuGPIlbe6y/?mibextid=wwXIfr
ALEX MISSPOKE. IT IS NOT CURRENTLY ON LOCALS BUT IT WILL BE SOON.
Her call starts at 7:30
She was Tommy Fellows from CPPs decoy while she made this call. She attempted to mask her voice with her decoy voice.
2 weeks ago, she admitted she was the one who made the call.
We are going full steam ahead with pressing charges for this.
This is from when i got swatted in this video: https://predatorpoachers.locals.com/post/6338200/we-get-swatted-when-a-very-dangerous-pedo-says-hes-had-tons-of-relationships-with-minors-sparta-m
From Grok on what this means:
This is standard legal language from an appellate court (usually in a criminal case) indicating that the court-appointed lawyer for the person appealing (the "Appellant" ) is trying to get off the case.
Breakdown:
Appellant: The person who lost in the lower court and is now appealing.
Appointed attorney:
A lawyer provided by the court (typically because the appellant can't afford one).
Moved for leave to withdraw: The attorney has formally asked the court for permission to stop representing the appellant. Court-appointed lawyers can't just quit; they need the judge's approval.
Has tendered a brief: The attorney has submitted a written legal document (the "brief" ) to the court.
What this usually means in practice (Anders procedure)
This phrasing almost always signals an Anders brief (from the U.S. Supreme Court case Anders v. California, 1967).
In an Anders situation:
The appointed appellate lawyer has reviewed the case and concluded there are no non-frivolous (reasonable) issues...
He is indeed, going to pwison.
Cp/rso violation/chats
His video here: https://predatorpoachers.locals.com/post/7864094/multi-time-sex-offender-panics-and-faints-over-and-over-again-it-doesnt-work-livingston-county
